On 4/Jul/19 17:50, Ben Maddison via NANOG wrote: > We have been dropping Invalids since April, and have had only a > (single-digit) handful of support requests related to those becoming > unreachable. We've had 2 cases where customers could not reach a prefix. Both were mistakes (as we've found most Invalid routes to be), which were promptly fixed. One of them was where a cloud provider decided to originate a longer prefix on behalf of their content-producing customer, using their own AS as opposed to the one the customer had used to create the ROA for the covering block. Mark.
- Re: Verizon Routing issue ML
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Max Tulyev
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Max Tulyev
- How Verizon and a BGP Optimizer Knocked Large Parts... Martin J. Levy
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Scott Weeks
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Francois Lecavalier
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Ben Maddison via NANOG
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka
- RE: CloudFlare issues? Francois Lecavalier
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Ben Maddison via NANOG
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Nick Hilliard