We deploy routers with Verizon LTE failover - for full functionality, make sure your MTU is 1428 or less, per their specifications.
Here's an example doc from Spirent that talks about it. https://support.spirent.com/SC_KnowledgeView?Id=FAQ14556 Alex On Mon, Jun 24, 2019, 7:51 AM Dovid Bender <do...@telecurve.com> wrote: > I am getting the same for SSH and https traffic. It's strange. Where the > response is something small like: > <html><head></head><body> > Moved to this <a href="https://63.XX.XX.XX:443/auth.asp">location</a>. > <!-- response_code_begin ERIC_RESPONSE_OK response_code_end > response_msg_begin response_msg_end --></body></html> > It works But when I try to load pages that are any bigger it fails. Like I > said before I assume it's either an issue with the MTU or window szie. I > was just wondering if anyone encountered such an issue before. It's not > easy getting to someone that knows something. When you have some sort of > concrete info the level1 techs tend to pass you along faster. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 7:41 AM J. Hellenthal <jhellent...@dataix.net> > wrote: > >> Could be wrong on this but direct SSH on the LTE side may possibly be not >> allowed(filtered) and might just be something you could discuss in a ticket >> with Verizon. >> >> -- >> J. Hellenthal >> >> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven >> says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. >> >> On Jun 24, 2019, at 04:50, Dovid Bender <do...@telecurve.com> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I finally got around to putting in a Verizon LTE connection and the ping >> times are pretty good. There is the occasional issue however for the most >> part ping times are < 50 ms. I have another strange issue though. When I >> try to ssh or connect via the endpoints web interface it fails. If I first >> connect via PPTP or SSL VPN then it works. I ruled out it being my IP since >> if I connect direct from the PPTP or SSL VPN box then it fails as well. It >> seems the tunnel does something (perhaps lowering the MTU or fragmenting >> packets) that allows it to work. Any thoughts? >> >> TIA. >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:18 AM Dovid Bender <do...@telecurve.com> wrote: >> >>> Anyone know if Verizon static IP's over LTE have same issue where they >>> bounce the traffic around before it gets back to the NY metro area? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:46 PM Dovid Bender <do...@telecurve.com> wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Thanks for all of the feedback. I was on site today and noticed two >>>> things. >>>> 1) As someone mentioned it could be for static IP's they have the >>>> traffic going to a specific location. The POP is in NJ there was a min. >>>> latency of 120ms which prob had to do with this. >>>> 2) I was watching the ping times and it looked something like this: >>>> 400ms >>>> 360ms >>>> 330ms >>>> 300ms >>>> 260ms >>>> 210ms >>>> 170ms >>>> 140ms >>>> 120ms >>>> 400ms >>>> 375ms >>>> >>>> It seems to have been coming in "waves". I assume this has to do with >>>> "how cellular work" and the signal. I tried moving it around by putting it >>>> down low on the floor, moving it locations etc. and saw the same thing >>>> every time. I am going to try Verizon next and see how it goes. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:13 PM Mark Milhollan <m...@pixelgate.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Dovid Bender wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >I finally got around to setting up a cellular backup device in our >>>>> new POP. >>>>> >>>>> >When SSH'ing in remotely the connection seems rather slow. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps using MOSH can help make the interactive CLI session less >>>>> annoying. >>>>> >>>>> >Verizon they charge $500.00 just to get a public IP and I want to >>>>> avoid >>>>> >that if possible. >>>>> >>>>> You might look into have it call out / maintain a connection back to >>>>> your infrastructure. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /mark >>>>> >>>>