Hi, On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:48:49 -0800 Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Tony Hain wrote: > > > While people frequently claim that auto-config is optional, there are > > implementations (including OS-X) that don't support anything else at > > this > > point. The basic message is that you should not assume that the host > > implementations will conform to what the network operator would > > prefer, and > > you need to test. > > I can configure OS-X statically, so, that simply isn't true. > > What is true is that there are many implementations which do not (yet) > support DHCPv6. That is not the same as "don't support anything > else". > Here are a couple of implementations of DHCPv6, including one that also works under Windows. I played with one of them on my Linux boxes a while back (I can't remember exactly which one), and it just worked: https://fedorahosted.org/dhcpv6/ http://klub.com.pl/dhcpv6/ Regards, Mark.
