> > I suppose you can individually configure every host to get itself > > temporary addresses from RA announcements. This isn't usually a > > good default configuration, but OS implementation already seems to > > be inconsistent on the default configuration here. So we're back to > > the IPv4 dark ages where you have to walk around to all the devices to > > effect changes in policy (beyond prefix field contents). > > > I'm not sure, but you seem to be implying that you need to configure > hosts to tell them to use RA or DHCPv6 to get addresses. My apologies > if this is not your intention. > > RA messages are always going to be sent by routers and received by > hosts, even if DHCPv6 is being used for address assignment.
This does not seem to be generally true: - For the routers I am most familiar with (Juniper M/MX), you need to explicitly turn on router advertisement to make the router perform this. I.e. it is perfectly possible to have an interface with an IPv6 address which does *not* send RAs. - For the operating system I am most familiar with (FreeBSD), RAs are *not* accepted by default if the interface in question is configured with a static IPv6 address. Both of these choices seem perfectly reasonable to me. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no