On 02/02/2009 10:45, "Dorn Hetzel" <dhet...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On a related note, do you think that 0.0.0.0/8 <http://0.0.0.0/8>  (excluding
> 0.0.0.0/32 <http://0.0.0.0/32> , of course :) ) will be feasible for
> allocation and use ?

0.0.0.0/8 is reserved for self-identification. See RFC 1700:

      (b)   {0, <Host-number>}

         Specified host on this network.  Can only be used as a
         source address.

Regards,

Leo Vegoda


Reply via email to