TJ wrote: >> ... not to mention that fact that IS-IS is, IMHO, a much nicer IGP to >> work > with. > > WRT that last sentence, that is an almost religious debate I was trying to > avoid starting ... :) >
I will offer a mantra that has helped me, over the years, about the indeed religious wars that emerge when a New Technology or Youthful feature comes to these two link state protocols. I begin to mutter "ISNT and OySPF".