TJ wrote: >> Personally, I like the fact that IPv4 and IPv6 control plane are >> different, thus I'd go for OSPv3. > > I totally agree on the discrete/segregated control planes, although note > that - for those who want it - OSPFv3 will "soon" be able to do IPv4 route > exchange as well ...
Only if the vendors pick up on those changes. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen > > > /TJ > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se] >> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 6:23 AM >> To: devang patel >> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 >> >> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, devang patel wrote: >> >>> I do have some confusion about which one is better for IPv6 in Service >>> Provider networks as far as IP routing and MPLS application is concern! >> Both work and have advantages and disadvantages. >> >> Personally, I like the fact that IPv4 and IPv6 control plane are >> different, thus I'd go for OSPv3. ISIS-MT means you have to know that all >> your ISIS speakers will handle the MT packets gracefully. I know products >>from large vendors in the market which do not (IPv6 not enabled, it >> receives IPv6 MT packets, affects IPv4 ISIS control plane badly). >> >> -- >> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > > -- Airwire - Ag Nascadh Pobal an Iarthar http://www.airwire.ie Phone: 091-865 968
