-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Patrick,
On 1 dec 2008, at 02.33, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
The thing about a carrier hotel is that it cannot be a secret
location
since you need to allow various carriers and ISPs to have physical
access to the building so they can install/manage their
servers/routers/switches.
The advantage of this swedish data centre is that even if its
location
is well known, it is pretty hard to harm the building. You can't
run a
truck full of explosives into it for instance.
Unfortunately, you also cannot run your own fiber there, colo
equipment there, visit it for any reason, etc.
for the non-Stockholm locations that is not true. As a matter of fact,
you will have to get your own fibers to Netnod there. As for co-lo of
equipment, not as easy as in a neutral co-location. As for visits, why
would you need to?
As for fibers, Stockholm has a fiber monopoloy run by the city of
Stockholm. So you would have to buy fibers from that monopoloy in any
case.
I was going to say 'this probably hinders customers adoption at
NetNod', but I know for a fact the "probably" is superfluous.
That is your judgement. We have seen the largest growth for a long
time in the last year.
Best regards,
- - - kurtis -
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkk0MeMACgkQAFdZ6xrc/t7REACfThTzW+3+mvA0ttvViTTVmMfv
qgUAmwQyiuAaB/+vTD9wMtqCq7PDhw0F
=ycFe
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkk0PIgACgkQAFdZ6xrc/t727wCgvi0zOw4ivBe7AG98hb+DqoGI
qicAn0WKn/yUoqYLln2yP7GuxM16NHzT
=7Njx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
