That's not true, as not all our prefixes were hijacked nor leaked, since they 
were originating them.  If they were leaking them you might be able to see 
further AS's on the AS-PATH, incluiding the legitimate AS for originating those 
prefixes.

My point here is also about peers and upstreams to set properly filter or 
max-prefix settings to avoid those nasty things.

Am i seeing things in a blur way ?  or this is supposed to happen as wind flows 
?

regards,
---
Nuno Vieira
nfsi telecom, lda.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301
http://www.nfsi.pt/



----- "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > We were hijacked aswell, by 27664 16735
> >
> > Our affected prefixes were:
> >
> > 94.46.0.0/16
> > 194.88.142.0/23
> > 194.11.23.0/24
> > 82.102.0.0/18
> > 195.246.238.0/23
> > 194.107.127.0/24
> > 81.92.192.0/19
> > 193.227.238.0/23
> >
> > We are trying to contact them in order to get some feedback, and
> some good explanation for this.
> 
> The obviously were leaking full routing, are we all gonna annnounce
> 'my 
> prefix was in there also?'
> 
> Bye,
> Raymond.

Reply via email to