On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:40, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > How about moving the meta-nanog themes in this thread to >> > nanog-futures, instead of adding to the noise on the main list? >> >> Because nobody reads it? > > Try "because nobody knows that NANOG has a website where you can > simple instructions to subscribe to Nanog-futures".
Does it really qualify as a "futures" item? Larry's point seems more for the present than for the future. -Jim P.
