On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:40,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > How about moving the meta-nanog themes in this thread to
>> > nanog-futures, instead of adding to the noise on the main list?
>>
>> Because nobody reads it?
>
> Try "because nobody knows that NANOG has a website where you can
> simple instructions to subscribe to Nanog-futures".

Does it really qualify as a "futures" item?   Larry's point seems more
for the present than for the future.

-Jim P.

Reply via email to