I will do so. Look forward to the tour. Matt
Russell Mitchell wrote: > Matt: > I've already put this offer up. I'll be more then happy to meet up at > our datacenter and take you through our space. > What I find funny is, your the first one whom participated in the recent > reports to actually take up and respond to us. > I've emailed Garth and Jart, and both of them refused to respond. > > I emailed both of them requesting the same information they gave to > Directi. If they were able to provide Directi with a list of 20,000+ > domains from their control that were abusive, why can't they provide US > directly with a single 1? > > Then, release a joint-statement talking about how the companies need to > come together to combat the abusive activities across the net, yet when > we extend our hand and open up our network, we don't even get a response! > > Directi went from being a "partner in crime" with us to being a great > anti-abuse supporting company. How can YOU claim that WE don't do > anything, if you won't report your findings in the first place? Got > recent stuff? Why are you willing to give it now that we're OFFLINE? > What can we do about it NOW at this very minute? > > You tell me when your going to be in San Francisco, and I'll make myself > available. > > Thank you for your time. Have a great day. > > --- > Russell Mitchell > InterCage, Inc. > > P.S. I just realized all my responses to earlier people like Gadi and > them were direct and not cc to NANOG. Will "Reply to all" now :) > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Matt Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Russell Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 4:02:15 PM > Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer > > Russell Mitchell wrote: >> ----- >> >> Matt: >> It's very sad that your PROUD of you contribution to the supposed > "white paper" on our company. I'd like to know, was any of your > "contribution" to the report altered, or mis-represented, or are you > truly unaware of how false the information you provided was? >> Care to have verified it? or are you a Spamhaus admin like John Reid > who has that magic stick to make a claim and attack anyone who objects > to it with the truth? > > I'd love to, but nanog isn't the place. I'll be in san fran in the near > future. Lets sit down over a beer, I'll bring the research and you can > look it over yourself. That would be far more productive than this. I > think a few other folks would love to meet up with you as well. Maybe > Emil can join us too? > > It's easy to insinuate from behind a keyboard. Lets get down to facts. > > But take this off nanog. This is NOT the place for it. Let me know when > you'l be in town, I'll schedule my travel in that direction to meet up soon. > > Matt > > -- > -------------------------------------------- > Matthew Jonkman > Emerging Threats > Phone 765-429-0398 > Fax 312-264-0205 > http://www.emergingthreats.net <http://www.emergingthreats.net/> > -------------------------------------------- > > PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc > > > -- -------------------------------------------- Matthew Jonkman Emerging Threats Phone 765-429-0398 Fax 312-264-0205 http://www.emergingthreats.net -------------------------------------------- PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc
