On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:32 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, William Pitcock > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sadly, I don't have any contact with either one, but I do need to be > > able to access that server, and it's responsible admin is no where to be > > found. > > common sense and courtesy says you should contact ubiquity, then mzima > before even thinking of hitting up nanog@ > and, wild guess, it looks like it's probably on the ubiquity side of things.
I'm aware what side it's on. However, I didn't have contact information for an actual human on either side of the link, so I posted on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Normally, I wouldn't take such an action, but the availability of services on that machine (revision control for several open source projects as a starting point), makes the machine's availability essential. William
