On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Lynda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, that's not a bad idea. Of course, there's the larger problem; > verifying that the address space previously sullied is now worthy of being > cleaned up. In Nick Shank's case (and Bravo! to Nick), I would say that he's > off doing the right thing. It would seem that some serious investigation > would be necessary before acting as a third party for others in a similar > boat, of course.
There's already a bunch of companies that have built up a business model on this.. they call it "deliverability"
