>On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 05:25:16PM -0500,
> Chris Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 53 lines which said:
>It is because, if someone reports (by telephone, IRC or IRL) that he
>sent an email and I did not receive it, I regard as VERY IMPORTANT to
>be able to check the spam folder (with a search tool, not by hand) and
>go back to him saying "No, we really did not receive it".
In article
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frank Bulk -
iNAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>You mean, you don't employ *any* spam mitigation techniques besides sorting?
>Because if you do anything, even as basic as RBLs, you're not being
>consistent with your stance.
I agree completely with Chris Owen's approach, even though I use spam
mitigation techniques.
The reason for this is because those "lost" emails that I very
occasionally rescue from the spam bucket are:
NOT sent by someone on an RBL
NOT sent to an unpublished and unused address
(eg [EMAIL PROTECTED])
etc.
--
Roland Perry
