Eric; The only reason I would have supported rejecting the proposal is the 'morality' language related to offensive TLD's. .
What's your take on that part of the process? Marty ----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Martin Hannigan Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri Jun 27 10:57:15 2008 Subject: Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Martin, I wasn't that impressed with Dave's remarks, but I heard them rather than read them, which may have made a difference. I agree with your views on the substance and spirit of Susan's and Wendy's statements. This -- the new GTLD process -- was originally scheduled to get to completion in 2003 and 2004 -- after the initial 2000 round. Eric Martin Hannigan wrote: >> See pages 17 - 20 of >> https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf >> See pages 22 - 25 of >> https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf >> > > I think that this is a good read as well, especially the comments by Dave > Wodeley, Susan Crawford, and Wendy Seltzer. > > https://par.icann.org/files/paris/BoardMeeting_26June08.txt > > > Best, > > Martin > > > > > >
