On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing > intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days?
This was planned, and then announced approx 5 days ago. You are subscribed to nanog-announce, right? ;-) -Jim P.
