On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:08:32PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > For multihomed, /22 is still the rule.
Over here in RIPE-land, I just got a /23 for AS44947, announced as two /24's. Seems to work fine. -- joe.
- nanog / nanog-announce s... Philip Smith
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Anno... Joe Abley
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Anno... Sam Stickland
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Anno... D'Arcy J.M. Cain
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Anno... Marshall Eubanks
- RE: [Nanog-futures] Anno... Jason J. W. Williams
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Anno... Jim Popovitch
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Anno... Robert E. Seastrom
- RE: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Security Admin (NetSec)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small fry... Owen DeLong
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small... Joe Warren-Meeks
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? david raistrick
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Heather Schiller
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Sean Figgins
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Seth Mattinen
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Sean Figgins
