On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If the way of running this isn't out in the wild and it's actually >> dangerous then a pox on anyone who releases it, especially to gain >> publicity at the expensive of network operators sleep and well being. >> May you never find a reliable route ever again. > > This needs fixing. It doesnt need publicity at security conferences > till after cisco gets presented this stuff first and asked to release > an emergency patch.
Agreed, You've got to remember though that a security conference is a commercial venture, it makes business sense for this to be publically announced at this security conference. I think security conferences have become something that sucks as its all become money making oriented and the people who run these things don't really have security in mind, just the £ signs reflecting on their eye balls. > --srs > -- > Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > All the best, n3td3v _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
