On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:03:39AM -0700, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote: > Interesting comment Paul. However, 16e and evdo are a "bit" heavy > with infrastructure to support mobility. Before giving that answer, > you may want to ask Deepak if he NEEDS mobility....
He needs mobility. If he doesn't know that, it means he hasn't done his due diligence properly. Cheers, -- jra > On 16 May 2008, at 10.23, Paul Wall wrote: > > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Are there any good (published) BCPs for building out Municipal WiFi > >> networks? Particularly in the security/authentication/scaling areas? > > > > BCP #58,271,432--which basically states "Don't," comes highly > > recommended. > > > > Instead, investigate your nearest .16e or evdo rev. A reseller. In the > > case of .16e, most available APN's are built around user and > > transport/transit abstractions, assuming shared-facilities, virtual > > providers, etc. The equipment used in both is a far cry from anything > > 802.11. -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin) _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
