Bjørn Mork wrote: > Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<snip> > After all, Microsoft must have a reason to block all icmp. Or? > >> However, in that case the only workable course of action would be TO >> DISABLE PATH MTU DISCOVERY! >> >> You can't have your cake and eat it too. > > But maybe the death of icmp is worth some sort of ceremony? Cake or > not. Oddly enough there is a draft on the subject of icmp filtering recomendations is making the rounds. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsec/draft-gont-opsec-icmp-filtering-00.txt The opsec working group ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and the authors would appreciate feedback from operators on the subject. thanks joelja > Bjørn > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > NANOG@nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
