On May 6, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> delay, because nanog meetings only happen N times per year, so
> an idea may have to wait months before it's widely circulated.
> congestion,
> because nanog meetings are of fixed duration and there is, and has
> to be,
> competition for the slots, to make the meeting interesting, keep
> quality high.
From one standpoint, these aren't necessarily unalloyed negatives, as
they act as a filter to keep the noise-level down, somewhat.
Are we convinced that there's a glut of useful technical/operational
information which folks have both the time and inclination to write
up, but which they don't due to the perceived lack of an appropriate
review/publication mechanism utilized by their intended audience?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // +66.83.266.6344 mobile
History is a great teacher, but it also lies with impunity.
-- John Robb
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
