On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:06:48 -0400 > > From: "Mike Lieman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.news.com/2100-1034_3-6237715.html > > > > > > > It's a FUD attempt to get people to forget about how AT&T owes > > everyone in the US with a telephone a check for $150,000.00 in > > statutory penalties for their unlawful spying.
If it's impossible to hold AT&T accountable for violating the Law in such a blatant, wholesale manner, how could anyone believe that they could be held accountable to whatever Network Neutrality standards would be ensconced in Law? _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
