On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
How is answering a query on TCP/53 any MORE dangerous than answering it on UDP/53? Really. I'd like to know how one of these security nitwitsjustifies it. It's the SAME piece of software answering the query either way.
How many bytes of shell code can you stuff in a 512 byte DNS UDP packet? How many bytes of shell code can you stuff in a TCP DNS connection? Rgds, -drc P.S. I still think blocking TCP/53 is stupid.
