On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 02:18:25 -0000, "Chris L. Morrow" said: > While S*BGP seem like they may offer additional protections and additional > knobs to be used for protecting 'us' from 'them', the very basics are > obviously not being done so added complexity is not going to really help > :( Or, perhaps its not that its not going to help its just not going to > get done because even prefix-lists are 'too hard', apparently.
"Wow, prefix-lists are *hard*" -- BGP Barbie.. You'd think that by now, we as an industry could do better than that. (Yes, I know the jury is still out on what really happened at L3-Hanaro. Doesn't change the fact that we collectively shoot ourselves in the foot because providers will believe the most implausible things from their neighbors, like announcements for 128/1 ;)
pgpSfwDHk0JW8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
