Surely that second quote should be "crap, now macrumors can tell that one
person in our office follows them obsessively"? Unless there's
publically-available information that indicates that IP address is your
CEO's (which is a whole other topic -- publically available rDNS for
company-internal IPv6 ranges).
In addition, IPv6 supports temporary addresses that can change every day.
If your browser binds to a temporary address, and it changes daily, then
the anonymizing feature of NAT becomes a whole lot less useful.
NAT is still evil though, the problems it causes operationally are
just plain not worth it.
Amen to that.
I think evil sums up NAT nicely :)
-Don
