On Wed, 30 May 2007, David W. Hankins wrote: > Maybe I'm getting old, but the idea of managing this configuration > information in my routers sounds like a real chore compared to the > old DHCP relayed central server model. not 'old' just 'sane'. or 'taking the same crazypills chris is', your call. > > Would there be interest on a DHCPv6 related presentation at NANOG? it would be nice perhaps a lightning talk? :) It is interesting that v6 went from 'eh, yea that's nice' to "holy crap, maybe I should figure this out?" in 4 months though...
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Adrian Chadd
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, w... David W. Hankins
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow