for a list filled with network operators and engineers, the lot of you are quick to whip out lawyers and courts and international tribunals. perhaps I missed the message, but has anyone mentioned the direct economic impact of SFI? as a responsible network operator, would you peer with a network that didn't filter their customers and was consistently linked to route leakage issues? when is enough, enough (in general, not speaking to any specific network)?
also, this: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The biggest problem here is that Cisco needs to change > their defaults to require more configuration than > > router bgp X > neighbor 1.2.3.4 remote-as A > > When that's the bar for the complexity required for setting up BGP, > bad things WILL happen. Period.