Greg VILLAIN wrote: > I'm not saying one should convert every single IX peering into a PNI, as > I feel both are pretty much required: your smallest peers shall be > secured on as many IXes as possible, your biggest ones via PNI. IX > peering is mandatory to keep internet routing diversity up to par - and > enable small ASes to grow.
The converse can also be true - we have a number of members who use the IX fabric as a backup to their PIs with larger peering partners. If you lose a PI carrying a GE of traffic, where does that traffic go? -- Will Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical Director LONAP Ltd
