> Paul Vixie wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hank Nussbacher) writes: > >> http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g08qkYTaNhLlscXKMnS3V8dkc-WwD8UAGH900 > > > > they say it's personally identifiable information, not personal property. > > EU's concern is the privacy implications of data that google and others > > are saving, they are not making a statement related to address ownership. > > Correct. In the EU DP framework (see: > [...] > P. S. How many bits in the mask are necessary to achieve the non-PII aim?
So, this could be basically a matter of dredging up someone with a /25 allocated to them personally, in the EU service area. I think I know some people like that. I know for a fact that I know people with swamp C's here in the US. That would seem to set the bar higher than a mere 7 bits. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
