On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:58:13AM -0400, Henry Yen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:29:54AM -0400, Joe Maimon wrote:
> > > On 10/23/07, Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-10-23-verizon-fios-plan_N.htm
> > >>
> > >>20 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, fully symmetrical for $65.
> > >
> > >
> > > That's pretty sweet, now all they have to do is start laying the fiber
> > > over here...
> >
> > And stop ripping out copper.
>
> Now that I've gotten caught up on my inbox, perhaps this apropos article
> will be viewed as more timely for this list than my earlier outburst:
>
>
> http://www.beskerming.com/commentary/2007/10/24/292/PhD_Student_Claims_200x_Improvement_for_Copper_Broadband
>
> (there's also a link in the article WRT to the Verizon issue of
> copper XOR fiber.)
The question here is always DISTANCE, and the plant topology.
I live close to fiber, but due to the way the boundaries are
drawn, I can't just go to the closest CO, I need to go to the one that
is 50k feet away. If they can do even 10Mb/s at a distance greater than
5 miles it's a welcome innovation. If it requires 350Mhz capable copper,
only works up to 1k feet, etc.. then i'd much rather have a conduit with
fiber appear nearby.
Perhaps the neighboring Verizon plant will extend into the currently
legacy SBC area, but I can only dream...
Time to do my own build-out.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
