> Randy pointed out rightly, this is not only your network that needs > upgrading, this is all the networks who communicate with you that needs > upgrading. > > So, classifying 240/4 as public use is unrealistic now and will remain > unrealistic in the near future.
agree > Classifying it as private use should come with the health warning "use this > at your own risk, this stuff can blow up your network". In other words, this > is for experimental use only. disagree. as you point out, this is analogous to deploying ipv6; i do not think you would want us to put an "experimental" warning on that. if you certify your kit to handle it, then it will work in production. randy
