Almost ALL?
Any company, or any person for that matter, that relies on their
Internet connectivity for their lively hood should be multihomed.
-wil
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
--Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
virendra rode //
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Frank
- ------------------------
Just curious, should "small responsive providers" should be multi-
homed?
regards,
/virendra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF+XOApbZvCIJx1bcRAtkwAJ9vNak3F8FlCf9VDycf6IlAr445nACg59kB
w2OWAGdchd2XQyxxgZWQaug=
=Yb1+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
