On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:38:18 MST, Danny McPherson said: > So, you're saying we can secure them so long as we put > them behind NAT AND humans don't use them?
I think a few messages back, I specifically phrased my comment about getting them off my radar to cover this - I actually don't care if they are or aren't in fact secure, as long as their insecurity, if any, isn't visible to the outside world.
pgprEdatLpXwn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
