On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:18:07 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [snip] > This whole discussion centered around the fact that > innocent 3rd parties with no ability to act, were being > sent large volumes of notifications. Once you remove the > innocent 3rd party from the equation, the shape of the > problem is quite different. > > I agree that notices should not be sent to addresses that > are likely to be forged because then innocent 3rd parties > are being spammed. However that does not mean that all > notifications are bad. >
It still doesn't make sense to send notification in any form other than a "5xx stuff your malware..." response. Any MTA-admin with half a clue seeing lots of such in the logs for outbound messages should know what to do. //per -- Per Heldal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
