On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:35:24PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > > 2. We know cable companies, dsl providers and mobile companies can use > > this many IPs, but they generally seem to make use of NAT and IPv6. > > So you ask folks to resort to hacks like NAT or force IPv6-only to their > users when there is still a lack-of-content problem there? Can you show > me your business plan draft for that? I'm curious. :-) I meant to ask this at a nanog or this IETF... why don't some of the larger content providers (google, msn, yahoo, to name 3 examples) put AAAA records in for their maint content pieces? why don't they get v6 connectivity from their providers (that offer such services) ? There are starting to be more and more folks with v6 connectivity... it'd be interesting as a way to drive usage on v6, eh? > > BTW, Softbank got 2400:2000::/20. holy freeholy! good thing v6 space is 'infinite' eh? :) -Chris
