-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2004-11-22, at 19.29, william(at)elan.net wrote: > What is bad however is that IETF instead of pursuing it as > one effort has several of them including MULTI6, HIP, etc. I don't see this as really true. MUTLI& is tasked with solving the problem of scalable site-multihoming for IPv6. HIP is tasked with defining the experimental protocol HIP. They are not mutually exclusive. I would actually like to argue that they are more complimentary. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQancq6arNKXTPFCVEQKD8wCfV11jFyqW1swUJyP6h0ToB8OR4N8An2NM mxR7AmAf8qKnp/E3967ge1HO =pJet -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
