> No connectivity to the internet? -> use ULA, quick, easy, cheap.
ULA leaves a bad taste for a number of reasons, some of which
have seen some discussion. What has not occured, and seems to
be a major tenent of the ULA zelots, is how conflict resolution
is to be done.
if ULA is sufficent, in and of itself, then why do we need to
have all the rest of the 128bits of space?
if ULA users ever have a conflict (and yes, they will) how will
the conflict be resolved?
and then there is the nasty delusion of "Internet"... protestations
to the contrary, the VSNL view of the "Internet" is vastly different
than the US DOD view of the "Internet", is vastly different than the
GE view, is different than the AS 701 view, is different than the
Chinese R&E Network (CERN) view.... which one(s) count? Policy
routing dictates that there is no such thing as a "global" routing
table...
For me, as long as I have IP reachability to those folks whom I want
or need to talk to, I could care less about the "rest" of the folks
using IP to move datagrams about ...
> Greets,
> Jeroen
>
