On 11/15/04 12:18 AM, "Daniel Roesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunate, even today there are not many option of transit ISPs > who have a real native dual-stack deployment (I consider 6PE to be > native)... most have just tunnels inside. Currently I cannot think > of more than... hm... 3-4 ISPs who can deliver real amounts of > native US-EU bandwidth. What sort of customers do these v6 SP's have for IPv6? What demands are there for real amounts of IPv6 bandwidth? Thanks, Christian
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?... Jared Mauch
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painl... Jeroen Massar
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painl... Christian Kuhtz
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?... Mike Leber
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painl... Christian Kuhtz
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering p... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumberi... Jeroen Massar
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumberi... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumberi... Paul Vixie
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumberi... Christian Kuhtz
