Henry Linneweh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not a good beginning > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1642848,00.asp
It's a predictable response by the spammers. Did anybody really expect the spammers to go "oh, well, that's it, we'd better shut up shop now"? I'm an advocate of SPF, but not because it's the magic bullet that stops spam. It does however allow innocent domains to say "no, I didn't send that" and thus avoid the double-bounced backwash from a spammer forging their domain as the sender. -- PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for full key
