On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:00:55 +0100 (IST) Paul Jakma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> risk of crypto DoS than compared to the simple BGP TCP MD5 hack. The > risk is due to MD5, not IPSec :). I would say the risk is due to implementation. If the vendor's gear vomits quicker due to a resource consumption issue in handling MD5, is this really a problem with MD5? These issues can usually be fixed by simply improving the scaling properties of the implementation that may be required during adverse conditions. John
