Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Luyer wrote: > > > Site Finder on its own added to spam; spam volumes increased as the number > > of "sender domain does not resolve" bounces dropped away. > > That is a myth: http://www.xtdnet.nl/paul/spam/graphs/versign.png > > If you want to blame spam on a single corporatin, the graphs clearly show > to blame microsoft. Besides, they have more money then Verisign anyway :) > Perhaps you didn't (or don't) use a filter that header checks the domain in the envelope. We did, and we had a tremendous increase in spam allowed through the servers. It receded as soon as we installed the BIND fix (as I've posted to the list at that time). -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Sit... william<at>elan.net
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Sit... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch &quo... Paul Vixie
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relau... Michael Loftis
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relau... JC Dill
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relau... David Luyer
- RE: [IP] VeriSign prepares to r... Paul Wouters
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares... Joshua Coombs
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares... William Allen Simpson
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... David Lesher
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... Scott Savage
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relau... Brian Bruns
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... JC Dill
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relau... Paul Vixie
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch ... Wayne E. Bouchard
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relau... Michael Loftis
- Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to r... Marshall Eubanks
