> > * Are they breaking anti-UCE filters by doing this? (yes) > > How? They own example.com. If UCE happens to contain a forged sender > of roble.com, would you consider that even remotely useful in a filter? > Why should example.com be any different? they will likely never use the > domain name, so probably wouldn't care if you feel the need to blacklist > it explicitly, for that matter.
Maybe NANAE will let y'all borrow one of the troll signs. [Attribution removed because my remark is not aimed at any one particular potser here.)
