Brennan,

If you want your routes to be human parse'able, I recommend running your lab in full 
IPv6 mode.  That way you take Valdis's recommendation to a whole new level (and base 
number system).

Plus...  Whats the point of having a lab that only uses 1982/1983 addressing 
techniques (1/8, 10/8, 100/8 are classfull addresses).  Labs are meant to push the 
limits of todays technology and experiment with future concepts.  IPv6 matches that 
criteria.

Martin

---
At 10:07 AM 5/30/2003 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 30 May 2003 05:49:28 PDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:
>
>> one of the things I want to do is make it much
>> easier to "parse visually" my route tables.
>
>Might want to use networks 4/8, 16/8, and 64/8 - they stand out
>nicely when looking at net numbers in hex or binary. ;)
>

Reply via email to