> > A cisco router with the default (ip proxy-arp) enabled on >the interface will spend all its time doing arp/proxy-arp for the hosts and >it will actually work believe it or not. > I spent quite a few cycles trying to convince Cisco that changing this default in the next major release is a very good idea. Unfortunately I failed. Pete
- RE: iBGP next hop and mult... alex
- RE: iBGP next hop and mult... Pete Templin
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... David Schwartz
- RE: iBGP next hop and mult... Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Pete Templin
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... alex
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Jared Mauch
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Petri Helenius
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... alex
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... jlewis
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access ... Majdi S. Abbas
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-ac... Ralph Doncaster
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Peter E. Fry
- Re: iBGP next hop and mult... Pete Templin
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media John M. Brown
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Ralph Doncaster
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Mark Kent
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Gregory Urban
