At 02:59 PM 9/1/2006, you wrote:
mos wrote:
AMD Athlon 64X2 3800+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512K cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4400+ Dual Core S939 Toledo (2x1MB cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4600+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
I would think, as a blind guess, that the Toledo processor (twice the
cache) would be the hands-down winner in this list.
I would think so too but common sense approach when choosing hardware isn't
always correct.:) What looks good on paper doesn't necessarily make it in
the real world. Take a look at Intel's HyperThreading feature which
delivered very little performance improvement but was a great marketing ploy.
I just wanted to know if anyone actually has used the chip and has seen a
difference using 1mb cpu cache compared to the 512k cache. TIA
Mike
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
