I have a bug about repeating tasks with nested subtasks

The task structure is roughly
└─1
     ├─2
     │ ├─2.1
     │ └─2.2
     └─3
         ├─3.1
         └─3.2

I need to set different times for tertiary tasks and repeat them every day
Therefore, the subtask cannot inherit the time of the parent task.
However, this creates a problem
If I choose to have the three parent tasks 1, 2 and 3 automatically repeat 
and reset the subtasks after all subtasks are completed, then the task 1 
will never be completed, no matter how many times it is completed 2, 3.1 
will never be activated day, because 1 always has a bunch of 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 
etc that are not completed in the future. And if I complete 1 manually, a 
worse situation will occur. 2 and 3 will be reset to the time of 1, but 
2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 will not. They will stay on the initial day permanently.

And if I choose to let 1 automatically repeat and reset the subtasks after 
all subtasks are completed, and let 2,3 inherit the time of 1. Then no 
matter 2,1,2,2, 3.1, etc. are completed, the two-level parent tasks 2 and 3 
will never be completed. Let alone completing 1.

In other words, if subtasks 2 and 3 need to set time, and are nested with 
subtasks 2.X and 3.X that need to set time, then 1 will always have a bunch 
of future subtasks that cannot be completed.

The idea that is consistent with human understanding is that after 
completing all the grand tasks 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 every day, activated 
subtasks 2 and 3 will appear (at this time 2 and 3 will not have subtasks), 
and after completing 2 and 3 manually, the activated parent will appear. 
Task 1. After clicking Finish 1 again, the entire task tree will be reset.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/8ccad498-325e-489d-b399-175fe7084922n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to