On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 11:30:55AM +0200, Laura Orvokki Kursula via Mutt-users wrote:
> > > I have encountered a strange problem setting up mutt: when I > > > attach a signature block to my e-mail using `$signature', my PGP > > > signature is, according to mutt, invalid. E-mails without > > > signature blocks yield valid PGP signatures. If I go back and > > > replace the automatic signature with something else, the PGP > > > signature checks out too. Is this a known issue? Is there > > > something I can do about it? > After some more testing, I figured out this issue had nothing at all > to do with signature blocks, or mutt. The culprit was the silly > `X-Clacks-Overhead' header I had configured postfix to add ages > ago. How I came to think it had a correlation with whether or not I > use a `$signature' remains a mystery; my bet is on a lack of sleep. But that is even odder. GPG signatures don't cover headers. Is it possible that your postfix bit was in fact added to the body instead? -- Ian
