On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 04:04:34PM +0200, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:

> > I think for a true date received test, you have to look at the
> > timestamp part of the filename.

> Well, it looks like both mtime and timestamp-as-part-of-filename may
> change when copying messages between Maildirs, at least when using
> Mutt and a local filesystem. So if mtimes do not reflect the desired
> timestamp, neither might timestamp-as-part-of-filename.

I was thinking of just using cp and friends, and yes I have done that
to move around my maildirs.

I'm curious if mutt preserves the mtime when doing the mutating
operations I mentioned ie. rethreading or editing after the fact.
Especially in the case of editing, I have serious doubts that mtime
is preserved.  But maybe mutt also creates a fresh message in this
case, my memory is foggy.

I'm also curious what other programs look at the mtime to determine
time delivered. I mean real programs, not your hand written scripts
;-)

Friendly,

-- 
Ian

Reply via email to