> Darn, that was my best guess. After I sent the email, I even found some old > bug reports that 0xa0 was considered "space" on MacOS (e.g. > https://bugs.python.org/issue7072) > > Still, perhaps there is something different about the way Mutt was built > versus the quick compile. > > Have you ever built Mutt yourself? Would you be able to try, and try > applying the attached patch to a recent release tarball?
Yes, and it solved the problem!!! Thank you very much! I haven't compiled mutt by myself for long, so I rewrote the homebrew formula to use the patch and let homebrew recompile (mutt 2.2.3). It's really great that I don't have to check Subject every time any more to see if the last character is truncated. Thank you Kevin and all the others for considering and solving this problem. Sincerely, -- Kenichi Asai
