Hi Jean, Jean Louis schrieb am 30.06.2021 17:52:55: > That is good idea. It is nice hack. Intercept the file, change it a > bit if necessary and delegate to editor. > > I think in this version I will not get the To: field, I will get the > reply message.
My fault: I was implying that you have edit_headers on: :set edit_headers="yes" Now run that “hack” again and your good to go. 🙂 > Maybe first piping, getting email address, recording ID, then reply as > usual. The ID actually need not be in the text, it can be outside of > Mutt, important is that I can access the "current ID" from editor. True, you could maybe even put it into the postponed location and then try to send that message. I guess that could work as one nice macro, too. If the above does not work, let’s elaborate on this idea later. Anyhow I guess, edit_headers="yes" opens up some new capabilities; maybe even doing everything inside emacs without the “hack” above. > This is all good as brainstorming. Nice, any chance that this system will be talked about in a blog or something like that? This CRM of yours sounds like an interesting read. > Also good idea. That is what I have to do. Great! Best Regards, PM
